technology tidbit #2

By Natalie Harr

“Would you rather that your children learn to play the piano, or learn to play the stereo?”
                   
                                                    -Mitchel Resnick, Amy Bruckman, Fred Martin
 (1996)

(Blog Post #5)

Picture

In the article, Pianos Not Stereos: Creating Computational Construction Kits (1996), Mitchel Resnick and his colleagues from MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Media Lab pose the question, 
“Would you rather that your children learn to play the piano, or learn to play the stereo?” Playing the stereo means choosing and listening to pre-recorded music. Playing the piano allows exploring and constructing sequences of sounds, rhythms, tempos, harmonies and styles of music. Stereo players are consumers; a piano player creates. 

One can think about educational technologies the same way. Resnick and his colleagues point out that there is a lot of “emphasis on the equivalent of stereos and CDs” in our educational technologies “and not enough emphasis on computational pianos” in what we make available to learners.


Picture

Video: Courtesy of PhET Sims
For Example…

PhET Interactive Simulations (see above) are widely used in classrooms today to help learners visually comprehend physical phenomena (e.g., forces of motion, gene expression, molecular shapes) that cannot be seen with the naked eye. Through the use of graphics and click-and-drag manipulation tools, PhET simulations are interactive enough to help students explore cause-and-effect relationships, connect them with underlying scientific concepts or real-world scenarios, and envision what cannot be easily observed in the real world. Resnick would say that PhET is a consumer technology; learners can choose a pre-created simulation to work with and manipulate it.

Just Think About It

PhET is a highly valuable tool for exploring “what happens when” scenarios and to help learners construct mental images of invisible phenomena. But just imagine if learners could build their own computer simulations — trying things out and making decisions on how to best model the complexities of the physical world — then running their simulation to see what happens. With that said, let’s check out the technology below…


Scratch Jr: A Technology Toolbox for Young Creators

PictureScratch Jr. Screenshot. Image Credit: Dev Tech Research Group


This new cyberlearning technology called Scratch Jr. supports young learners from ages 4-7 as producers of expressive media. 

Using a touchscreen device, children can create their own interactive stories and games   by dragging and connecting graphical programming blocks   to make characters and stories come to life.


And, it’s a FREE app for Android and i Pad tablets!

Resnick (cited at the beginning of this post) would say Scratch Jr. is a “creator” technology; children can playfully design, build, model, and test their own ideas using this digital toolbox. This kind of technology provides opportunities for deep, multidimensional learning that could not be made possible with a consumer technology. Educational technologies, such as Scratch Jr. -developed by Marina Bers and the DevTech Research Group– are designed with a constructionist approach to learning. In this approach, educational technologies are allowing learners to be creators. Stay tuned for more posts regarding Scratch Jr.



How Do They Come Up with These Technologies??!!
Constructionism is an approach to learning “by doing.” It builds from the renowned work of Jean Piaget and his theory of constructivism (notice the subtle difference in spelling). Piaget said that people generate knowledge and meaning (build schema) based on interactions between their experiences and their ideas. 

Seymour Papert, a protege of Piaget, took this theory several steps farther.  He has argued for a constructionist approach to learning; people actively engaged in designing things and making them work.  As a revolutionary thinker, he has envisioned the power of computers as a tool for learning, especially for children

  This video was made publicly available on YouTube by Seth Morabito.

Seymour Papert is the world’s foremost expert on how computers can foster learning. This  video demonstrates his remarkable insights into technology and learning decades ago — far before computers were feasible or affordable.  

 Constructionism: A Brief Timeline

I. The Beginning (1967-1980)

PictureImage Courtesy: Logo Foundation Website

     Logo: Learning by Programming

In 1967 Seymour Papert and his colleagues at the   Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed the first version of Logo; a groundbreaking computer programming environment to support mathematical learning. Since then, Logo has undergone several iterations and became widespread with the dawn of personal computers in the 1970’s. It has been used by young learners, novices, and experienced learners alike as a tool to develop simulations, games, and multimedia presentations. The most popular LOGO environment has featured a turtle icon, whose actions are controlled by the input of computer commands. In 1980, Papert published his highly influential book (especially in education) called Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas.


II. Logo Legacy continues  (1990’s)

PictureA Programmable Brick

For the past twenty years, Mitchel Resnick (a protege of Papert) has been developing a new generation of educational technologies that draw on the work ofSeymour Papert. In the article Pianos Not Stereos: Creating Computational Construction Kits (1996), Resnick and his colleagues describe three technologies they developed at the MIT Media Lab that draw on the constructionist approach to learning:

StarLogo was designed to help students “construct worlds in the computer” to explore the behaviors and patterns of decentralized systems (e.g., ant colonies, traffic congestion).
 

MOOSE Crossing was an online community that
provided students a way to collaboratively create and interact within virtual worlds. 

The programmable brick, a computerized and programmable Lego (e.g., reactions to sound, light, motion) block, now serves as the basis
for Lego robotic kits today.


III. educational technology (today)

Lego MindStorms (based on the programmable brick shown above) andScratch are two widely used educational technologies from Resnick’s MIT Media Lab that aim to support “learners as creators” in their own design activities. These technologies have been implemented into schools and other learning environments across the globe.

A YouTube video made publicly available by Camilla Bottke
Video: Courtesy of Scratch Ed

IV. Educational Technology (of the future!)

In upcoming blogs posts, we will explore the “next generation” of learning technologies such as  KIWI, Eco- MOBILE, Scratch Jr., InquirySpace, etc., that all have foundations in this constructionist approach to learning.

How to cite this work

CIRCL Educator posts are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. If you use content from this site, please cite the post and consider adding: "Used under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)."

Suggested citation format: [Authors] ([Year]). [Title]. CIRCLEducators Blog. Retrieved from [URL]

4 thoughts on “technology tidbit #2

  1. I am a friend and peer of Pat Bettley in Perry. She forwarded me your blog and I find it very helpful in my new position as design facilitator for K-4, including using the tech lab to foster authentic student learning. I am in the beginning stages of learning all the software available for students in my age bracket. Thank you for providing such a professional blog.

  2. Natalie, I enjoyed reading your blog post. As educators, I firmly believe a constructionist approach to teaching is crucial. Not only will the concepts we teach students become better ingrained in order for them to be more academically successful, but more importantly, teaching using constructionism leads to students connecting the material they are learning to the outside or “real” world.

    Looking forward to learning more about Scratch and Scratch Jr. too!
    Jenny

  3. Hi Cindy,

    It’s great to hear from you. Your new position sounds fascinating! I look forward to hearing more about it. Scratch Jr., was just released last week as a FREE download on iTunes! It requires an iOS 7 or later and can be used on an iPad. I’ll have a later post describing Scratch Jr. in more detail. I’ll also feature KIWI- a developmentally appropriate robotics kit designed for young children. It will be available for purchase soon. I’ll keep you posted!

  4. Hi Jenny,

    Thanks for your thoughtful comment. Resnick’s article probably hit home for you – especially with the “piano vs. stereo” analogy. I’m looking forward to hearing your feedback on how these “producer” technologies can foster learning for PreK-2 music classes. Best of luck with your new school year. GO RED DEVILS!

Comments are closed.